Supreme Court Blocks Census Citizenship Question For Now
In its opinion, the court said it doesn't think the Trump administration's rationale for adding the citizenship question is valid.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration cannot include a citizenship question on the 2020 census — at least, for now.
Some necessary background first — the citizenship question hasn't been included on a decennial census since 1950. But the federal government says it wants to bring it back to help the Department of Justice better enforce the Voting Rights Act.
Census data is used to determine how federal funds are spent, political representation in Congress, and the size of the country's population, among other things. But critics say that data could get skewed if people don't fill out the census because they're worried about a citizenship question.
The question has faced numerous court challenges since the administration first announced plans to add it back in 2018.
The Supreme Court's decision is a tad complicated. Ultimately, the court decided that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross' decision to reinstate the question was "reasonable." But at the same time, the court doesn't think the Trump administration's rationale for adding the question is valid.
As such, the justices ruled that the lower court was right to send the citizenship question back to the agency for more explanation. That means the question could still be included on the census if the Commerce Department gives valid reasoning in the future. The administration would probably need to do that soon, the current deadline to finalize printing for the 2020 census is July 1.
Additional reporting from Newsy affiliate CNN.
Supreme Court leak report findings: Lax security, loose lips
The Supreme Court's investigation didn't find the source of a leaked draft decision on abortion rights, but it did bring new insight into the court.By Patrick Semansky / AP
Supreme Court rejects firearms dealers' request to block N.Y. gun laws
Attorneys for gun dealers argued that their clients are "risking everything to try to stay in business" amid new laws for safety requirements.By Patrick Semansky / AP
How The Supreme Court Is Still Entangled In Jan. 6, Two Years Later
After Jan. 6, the Supreme Court was forced to take up cases regarding the very administration that put three justices on the bench.By Patrick Semansky / AP
George Santos not taking committee assignments amid calls to resign
Reports in recent weeks have surfaced that Santos fabricated his background before being elected to Congress in November 2022.By Patrick Semansky / AP
Washington may be divided, but one-party rule is common in most states
This "government trifecta" is when one political party controls the governor's office, the state Senate and the state House.By Storyblocks
Kelce brothers' hometown celebrates as they make Super Bowl history
Jason Kelce plays for the Philadelphia Eagles, while Travis Kelce plays for the Kansas City Chiefs. The brothers will face off in Super Bowl LVII.By News 5 Cleveland