U.S. News

Actions

Drugged Driving May Now Be Worse Than Drunk Driving

For fatal accidents where the driver's blood was tested, drugs appeared in drivers' systems more often than alcohol, according to a new study.
Posted
and last updated

Two nonprofit safety groups say drugged driving may now be a deadlier problem than drunk driving. 

The Governors Highway Safety Association and the Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility dove into government data from 2015, the most recent available. 

For fatal accidents where the driver's blood was tested, drugs appeared in drivers' systems more often than alcohol. 

In crashes where the driver died, 57 percent of drivers had their blood tested. Those tests showed alcohol was present in 38 percent of the cases, compared to 43 percent for drugs. 

And marijuana was the most common drug detected. 

The study says 9.3 percent of drivers who had their blood tested had amphetamines in their system. In many cases, drivers were combining drugs. 

Critics of the study point out some drugs, including marijuana, can show up in blood tests days after the drug was actually consumed. 

But the safety groups countered that argument with a 2014 study from Washington state. It found 44 percent of drivers said they had used marijuana within two hours of getting behind the wheel in the past year.

Other studies have found a large majority of smokers believe marijuana either does not affect their driving or actually makes them better at it. 

Past research studying the effects of marijuana on drivers is inconsistent. Some found marijuana slightly increased crash risk, while others said marijuana significantly increased crash risk. 

The safety groups argue that because blood tests are not completed in all fatal crashes, what we need most is more data and better ways to identify drug impairment on the roads.  

This year, the groups are giving grant money to five states to help police learn better methods for gauging drug impairment.