Supreme Court: President Biden Properly Ended Trump-Era Asylum Policy
President Joe Biden suspended the program on his first day in office in January 2021. But some lower courts ordered it reinstated.
The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Biden administration properly ended a Trump-era policy forcing some U.S. asylum-seekers to wait in Mexico.
The justices' 5-4 decision for the administration came in a case about the "Remain in Mexico" policy under President Donald Trump. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the decision and was joined by fellow conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh as well as the court's three liberal justices — Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
President Joe Biden suspended the program on his first day in office in January 2021. But lower courts ordered it reinstated in response to a lawsuit from Republican-led Texas and Missouri. The current administration has sent far fewer people back to Mexico than did the Trump administration.
The heart of the legal fight was about whether immigration authorities, with far less detention capacity than needed, had to send people to Mexico or whether they had the discretion under federal law to release asylum-seekers into the United States while they awaited their hearings.
About 70,000 people were enrolled in the program, formally known as Migrant Protection Protocols, after President Donald Trump launched it in 2019 and made it a centerpiece of efforts to deter asylum-seekers.
After President Biden's suspension of the program, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas ended it in June 2021. In October, the department produced additional justifications for the policy’s demise, to no avail in the courts.
The program resumed in December, but barely 3,000 migrants had enrolled by the end of March, during a period when authorities stopped migrants about 700,000 times at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Democratic-led states and progressive groups were on the administration’s side. Republican-run states and conservative groups sided with Texas and Missouri.
The case is Biden v. Texas, 21-954.
Additional reporting by The Associated Press.
Meet the woman who turned her basement into an immigration center
A former attorney and community activist turned her basement into a center to help migrants seeking asylum complete their applications.
Why is there a surge of migrants at the northern U.S. border?
Between last October and January 31, crossings at one part of the northern border skyrocketed to historic highs.
Group protests 30-foot border walls ahead of Biden's San Diego visit
A pair of 30-foot walls stand at Friendship Park, once a gathering spot for people on different sides of the border.
Pet shelters are packed while pet owners grapple with high costs
Shelters are filling for a multitude of reasons, including a lack of vets and as pet owners' home and financial situations change.
Shaquille O’Neal responds after questions about hospitalization
Shaquille O’Neal recently posted a photo while in a hospital bed hooked up to machines, which concerned fans.
What's so important about microchips?
The simple answer: as we’ve become more and more reliant on microchips they’ve simultaneously gotten harder to manufacture.