What Early Voting Numbers Tell Us About The 2020 Election
With a week until Election Day, over 67 million Americans have already voted, breaking the record for early voting set in 2016.
With still one week to go until Election Day, Americans have already shattered 2016 early vote numbers.
"People are voting in massive numbers, so despite everything, I don't see this as an election where the outcome is going to be affected by vote suppression so much as by enormous voter turnout," said Paul Smith, vice president for litigation at the Campaign Legal Center and professor at Georgetown Law School.
Seven days out, nearly 67 million ballots have been submitted, already surpassing the roughly 59 million early votes cast in 2016.
Most states expanded their early voting options due to the pandemic, and and Democrats are outvoting Republicans in the initial balloting.
The totals have Democrats hopeful, but what it means for the state of the race is far from clear.
Only 19 states publicly report the party ID of those requesting ballots, but party registration doesn't tell the full story. Not every registered Republican votes for President Trump, nor every Democrat for Joe Biden.
And Republicans have been preparing themselves for the Democrats' early-voting advantage, especially as President Trump has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that mail ballots are fraudulent.
"A lot of the rhetoric we've been hearing may be making people worried but we still have in place all of the structure and protections that have been used for decades and centuries to have a fair outcome of the process," Smith said.
Both parties expect a surge of Republicans to vote in-person on Election Day and chip away at the Democrats' lead.
How states tally the in-person vs. pre-Election Day votes could lead to dramatic swings in key states. That has the Biden campaign worried the president will prematurely declare victory and argue the large number of mail ballots yet to be counted by Election Night are invalid.
"I would not pay attention to either set of candidates or their surrogates in judging whether the election is fair. I would pay attention to what the election boards are doing, what the courts are deciding and to what the result is according to the state laws involved," said Charles Stewart III, a political science professor at MIT and national elections expert.
Fox libel defense at odds with top GOP presidential foes
Two politicians popular with Fox News' audience have advocated for the Supreme Court to revisit the libel standard Fox is using as shield.
Trump asks court to block Pence's testimony in 2020 election probe
The grand jury subpoena issued to Pence seeks documents and testimony related to the events of January 6.
Murdoch acknowledges some Fox hosts 'endorsed' false election claims
In a newly unsealed deposition, Fox Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch admits he could have stepped in to stop the hosts' false claims but didn't.
Who's who on Twitter? 'Verified' impostors blur the lines
Impostors have always been a problem on social media, but some worry that Twitter's new verification process is a step in the wrong direction.
Water crises threaten the lives of 190 million children in Africa
The triple threat of water-related crises include inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene.
Tracking brown macroalgae in the Atlantic Ocean
A large amount of sargassum is floating eastward in the Atlantic Ocean and is expected to create beach hazards as is runs into coastlines.