watch live
Politics

Federal Judge Upholds Eviction Moratorium, But Believes It's Illegal

U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich said her "hands are tied" by a previous ruling made by an appeals court above her.

Federal Judge Upholds Eviction Moratorium, But Believes It's Illegal
Brittainy Newman / AP
By AP
SMS
August 13, 2021

A federal judge is refusing landlords' request to put the Biden administration’s new eviction moratorium on hold, though she made clear she thinks it's illegal.

U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich on Friday said her “hands are tied” by an appellate ruling the last time courts considered the evictions moratorium in the spring.

Alabama landlords who are challenging the moratorium are likely to appeal.

Friedrich wrote that the new temporary ban on evictions the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention imposed last week is substantially similar to the version she ruled was illegal in May. At the time, Freidrich put her ruling on hold to allow the administration to appeal.

Man on porch

Rent Relief Funding Goes Unspent As Renters, Landlords Struggle

Congress alotted nearly $50 billion to pay landlords amid the pandemic, but some states and localities have struggled to disburse it.

LEARN MORE

This time, she said, she is bound to follow a ruling from the appeals court that sits above her, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

If the D.C. Circuit doesn't give the landlords what they want, they are expected to seek Supreme Court involvement.

In late June, the high court refused by a 5-4 vote to allow evictions to resume. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, part of the slim majority, said he agreed with Friedrich, but was voting to keep the moratorium in place because it was set to expire at the end of July.

Kavanaugh said then that he would reject any additional extension without clear authorization from Congress, which has not been able to take action.

In discussing the new moratorium last week, President Joe Biden acknowledged there were questions about its legality, but said a court fight over the new CDC order would buy time for the distribution of some of the $45 billion in rental assistance that has been approved but not yet used.

Additional reporting by the Associated Press.